Skip to main content

Chase Quick Deposit mobile app Fails

I opened a Chase checking account with two purposes in mind: one try out the online bill payment features to compare and contrast with ETrade (my current bank); and two, try the new highly advertised Quick Deposit feature on the iPhone app which allows one to take photos of the check and deposit via those photos.

Getting back from Christmas holiday and looking in the mail box I had 6 checks to try out the new Chase Quick Deposit feature.  This should be fun!  I open up the Chase app on my iPhone 4, sign in and find the feature no problem.  The apps user interface is fairly clean it looks like I enter the check amount and take two photos (front & back of check) to submit the check for deposit.  Appears easy enough - lets try it.

Check number one data entry goes just find, photo imaging works great, the app appears to have a "steady cam" sensor built in - it didn't use the flash (interesting).  Then after a few needless confirmation screens I select Submit and get back the first of a pattern of failure messages.  The message is useless - it tells me to try again, with no reason for the rejection.  Was it my photos - they were very good, did the auto text recognition misread the amount or the routing numbers?  I don't know just try again.  On the second try I get a bit better rejection info - the amount is higher than allowed.  What?  I can submit a check as long as it is below an undisclosed arbitrary amount.  Who's idea of a feature constraint was this bright idea?  And why did the application allow me to go beyond the validation of the first data field (Amount) to take two pictures and waste the bandwidth to upload the two pictures to image processing to make this limit determination?  Poor Chase - this did not meet my expectations, and you wasted my time.  And you don't want to accept $2850.00 of someone else's money into your bank at the first opportunity - sounds like failure to me.

OK let's try again on a lower amount check (wonder what is below their undisclosed threshold)?  Here's a check below $100.  First try failed for some unknown reason but I got a wordy message to "try again."  OK the second attempt worked.  Great, one success in 4 attempts.  I get better odds flipping a coin.  Now I have to track which checks actually work and which do not, this is added work on my part for the 6 check I have to deposit.  Is my life getting easier with this app - not so sure?  Let's try another check.



Third check - fails twice.  OK try a fourth check.

Fourth check fails first time.  OK a little recap:  one success in six attempts, the more I try the worse their success rate.  I spot the trend.  I'm wasting my time.  A walk to the ATM will take me 30 minutes and I get fresh Chicago street air, or I could continue with the Chase one-arm-bandit Quick Deposit machine.    

It is not Quick - unless you hit 7-7-7 on your first spin.  It doesn't deposit unless you have arbitrary low numbers. So altogether I would have to say it is neither Quick nor a Deposit feature.  Chase you are wrong on both terms.

Comments

Most Popular on Agile Complexification Inverter

Exercise:: Definition of Ready & Done

Assuming you are on a Scrum/Agile software development team, then one of the first 'working agreements' you have created with your team is a 'Definition of Done' - right?



Oh - you don't have a definition of what aspects a user story that is done will exhibit. Well then, you need to create a list of attributes of a done story. One way to do this would be to Google 'definition of done' ... here let me do that for you: http://tinyurl.com/3br9o6n. Then you could just use someone else's definition - there DONE!

But that would be cheating -- right? It is not the artifact - the list of done criteria, that is important for your team - it is the act of doing it for themselves, it is that shared understanding of having a debate over some of the gray areas that create a true working agreement. If some of the team believes that a story being done means that there can be no bugs found in the code - but some believe that there can be some minor issues - well, then yo…

David's notes on "Drive"

- "The Surprising Truth about what Motivates Us" by Dan Pink.

Amazon book order
What I notice first and really like is the subtle implication in the shadow of the "i" in Drive is a person taking one step in a running motion.  This brings to mind the old saying - "there is no I in TEAM".  There is however a ME in TEAM, and there is an I in DRIVE.  And when one talks about motivating a team or an individual - it all starts with - what's in it for me.

Introduction

Pink starts with an early experiment with monkeys on problem solving.  Seems the monkeys were much better problem solver's than the scientist thought they should be.  This 1949 experiment is explained as the early understanding of motivation.  At the time there were two main drivers of motivation:  biological & external influences.  Harry F. Harlow defines the third drive in a novel theory:  "The performance of the task provided intrinsic reward" (p 3).  This is Dan Pink's M…

Do You Put “CSM” After Your Name?

I’ve noticed a new trend—people have been gaining titles. When I was younger, only doctors had initials (like MD) after their names. I always figured that was because society held doctors, and sometime priests (OFM) in such high regard that we wanted to point out their higher learning. I hope it was to encourage others to apply themselves in school and become doctors also. Could it have been boastful?

The Wikipedia describes these “post-nominal initials”:
Post-nominal letters, also called post-nominal initials, are letters placed after the name of a person to indicate that the individual holds a position, educational degree, accreditation, office, or honor. An individual may use several different sets of post-nominal letters. The order in which these are listed after a name is based on the order of precedence and category of the order. That’s good enough for me.
So I ask you: is the use of CSM or CSP an appropriate use of post-nominal initials?
If your not an agilista, you may wonder …

Situational Leadership II Model & Theory

Have you ever been in a situation where you thought the technique needed to move forward was one thing, yet the person leading (your leader) assumed something else was what was needed?  Did you feel misaligned, unheard, marginalized?  Would you believe that 54% of all leaders only use ONE style of leadership - regardless of the situation?  Does that one style of leading work well for the many levels of development we see on a team?

Perhaps your team should investigate one of the most widely used leadership models in the world ("used to train over 5 million managers in the world’s most respected organizations").  And it's not just for the leaders.  The training is most effective when everyone receives the training and uses the model.  The use of a ubiquitous language on your team is a collaboration accelerator.  When everyone is using the same mental model, speaking the same vernacular hours of frustration and discussion may be curtailed, and alignment achieved, outcomes …

Elements of an Effective Scrum Task Board

What are the individual elements that make a Scrum task board effective for the team and the leadership of the team?  There are a few basic elements that are quite obvious when you have seen a few good Scrum boards... but there are some other elements that appear to elude even the most servant of leaders of Scrum teams.









In general I'm referring to a physical Scrum board.  Although software applications will replicated may of the elements of a good Scrum board there will be affordances that are not easily replicated.  And software applications offer features not easily implemented in the physical domain also.





Scrum Info Radiator Checklist (PDF) Basic Elements
Board Framework - columns and rows laid out in bold colors (blue tape works well)
Attributes:  space for the total number of stickies that will need to belong in each cell of the matrix;  lines that are not easy eroded, but are also easy to replace;  see Orientation.

Columns (or Rows) - labeled
    Stories
    To Do
    Work In P…