Skip to main content

Luke Arm - How long between invention and innovation?

Look at the advances in less than a decade.  Here's a video from May 2016 from IEEE Spectrum.



Prosthetic Hand Restores Amputee's Sense of Touch


Luke Arm (Sept. 2009)




How long did Luke Skywalker have to wait for his prosthetic arm? Not long he was back in the action within days it seems.

I’ve been loosely following the Luke Arm - Dean Kamen’s name of the DARPA funded prosthesis. First I’m floored that in 30 months the team could create such a beautiful design (beautiful in an engineering way). The human arm (counting the hand also) has 22 degrees of freedom (DOF) (movements like forearm rotation). The traditional hook and cable prosthetic has just 3 DOF. That hook was designed in the days of sailing ships, updated with aircraft cabling to allow some movement after World War I.

The typical user gives up on the frustrating hook/cable arm after a few years. Why? Kamen’s group think it is the low return on investment (ROI) the arms provide the user. They don’t provide enough benefit (mobility, dexterity, functionality) for their cost - here cost is not money as many are provided by VA benefits - but cost in more human terms, like comfort of the device interface. Just one of the drawbacks; the socket is designed to cup the “stump” and becomes sweaty and slippery reducing functionality and decreasing comfort.

Update:  see 3D Printing a Better Socket for Prosthetic Limbs (TED.com) by David Sengeh of MIT Media Lab

Want to see the Luke arm in action? YouTube - IEEE Spectrum (video).

Now what puzzles me is that it took less that 3 years to invent the prosthetic arm but will take at least 3 years in clinical trials (FDA) if there is funding for the trials. DARPA funding does not extend into the clinical trial. But why does this device even require FDA approval and trials?

If this was a game console (Wii or Xbox) controller - like a Power Glove it would not require FDA approval. How is the Luke arm different?

Deka (Kamen’s company) received $18.1 million for a 30 month contract started in 2005, and delivered working prototypes in late 2007. A modular device weighing less that the human arm and nearly just as capable! It appears to be a wonderful invention, waiting on FDA approval to become an innovation.

What’s the difference between invention and innovation? Innovation is when that wonderful idea actually gets to usefulness in society. It is typically a 30 year process between invention and innovation. Will we have to wait another 30 years?

Ray Kurzweil has plotted the exponential curve of innovation for some well know inventions, see:  Mass use of Inventions (mass use defined as 1/4 of US population).

More info on the Luke arm and other DARPA prosthetic arm research at IEEE Spectrum.

Update: May 2014 - It appears that the DARPA project is on a fast track - it will not take 30 years.

USA FDA approves Deka to market a prosthetic arm that can perform multiple, simultaneous powered movements controlled by signals picked up from sensors on the user's arm (electromyogram or EMG).

See story and video from re/code:
FDA Approves Robotic Prosthesis Controlled by Muscle Contractions By James Temple

See Also:

Weird but related - a robotic arm that can catch random objects thrown to it.
Robotic Arm Catches Objects on the Fly

Kids Design Their Own Prosthetics 



A Budget Exoskeleton


Mashable



Comments

Jon K said…
It probably shouldn't require FDA approval. See this note on how non-invasive prosthetic orthopedic devices are regulated:
http://openprosthetics.wikispot.org/Federal_Regulation_of_Prostheses

I would imagine that DEKA's concern is in getting an advance ruling that the device is indeed a Class I(Exempt) device, as it should be if its method of interacting with the patient is equivalent to existing devices.

Most Popular on Agile Complexification Inverter

Exercise:: Definition of Ready & Done

Assuming you are on a Scrum/Agile software development team, then one of the first 'working agreements' you have created with your team is a 'Definition of Done' - right?



Oh - you don't have a definition of what aspects a user story that is done will exhibit. Well then, you need to create a list of attributes of a done story. One way to do this would be to Google 'definition of done' ... here let me do that for you: http://tinyurl.com/3br9o6n. Then you could just use someone else's definition - there DONE!

But that would be cheating -- right? It is not the artifact - the list of done criteria, that is important for your team - it is the act of doing it for themselves, it is that shared understanding of having a debate over some of the gray areas that create a true working agreement. If some of the team believes that a story being done means that there can be no bugs found in the code - but some believe that there can be some minor issues - well, then yo…

Do You Put “CSM” After Your Name?

I’ve noticed a new trend—people have been gaining titles. When I was younger, only doctors had initials (like MD) after their names. I always figured that was because society held doctors, and sometime priests (OFM) in such high regard that we wanted to point out their higher learning. I hope it was to encourage others to apply themselves in school and become doctors also. Could it have been boastful?

The Wikipedia describes these “post-nominal initials”:
Post-nominal letters, also called post-nominal initials, are letters placed after the name of a person to indicate that the individual holds a position, educational degree, accreditation, office, or honor. An individual may use several different sets of post-nominal letters. The order in which these are listed after a name is based on the order of precedence and category of the order. That’s good enough for me.
So I ask you: is the use of CSM or CSP an appropriate use of post-nominal initials?
If your not an agilista, you may wonder …

David's notes on "Drive"

- "The Surprising Truth about what Motivates Us" by Dan Pink.

Amazon book order
What I notice first and really like is the subtle implication in the shadow of the "i" in Drive is a person taking one step in a running motion.  This brings to mind the old saying - "there is no I in TEAM".  There is however a ME in TEAM, and there is an I in DRIVE.  And when one talks about motivating a team or an individual - it all starts with - what's in it for me.

Introduction

Pink starts with an early experiment with monkeys on problem solving.  Seems the monkeys were much better problem solver's than the scientist thought they should be.  This 1949 experiment is explained as the early understanding of motivation.  At the time there were two main drivers of motivation:  biological & external influences.  Harry F. Harlow defines the third drive in a novel theory:  "The performance of the task provided intrinsic reward" (p 3).  This is Dan Pink's M…

Agile Story Estimation via Dog Grooming Exercise

Practice story estimation techniques with this exercise in dog grooming.

Related Post:
Affinity Estimating: A How-To by Sterling Barton.
Dogfood David why I feel like an expert in the concept of eating one's own dogfood.
   Slideshare:  Affinity Estimation - Size 60 Stories in about 20 Minutes.
For each dog below, estimate the work effort (size) required to groom the dog.  Assuming that you have the tools and experience to groom dogs.  Grooming includes washing, drying, combing, nail clipping, and hair triming in some cases.


Start with the ever popular:
Golden Retriever (22-24 in, 50-90 lbs).




The short haired Dachshund (15-28 lbs).



The Standard Poodle (15-18in, 40-80 lbs).




Bernese Mountain Dog (25-28 in., 65-120 lbs).




German Shepherd (23-26 in, 50-90 lbs).



Yorkshire terrier (5 in, <10 lbs).




Beagle (13-16 in, 18-35 lbs).



Boxer (26-31 in, 55-110 lbs).




Bulldog (40-55 lbs).





Labrador Retriever (21-25 in, 55-130 lbs).





Great Dane (28-38 in, 120-200 lbs).




Komondor (25-32 in, 90-130 lbs).


Situational Leadership II Model & Theory

Have you ever been in a situation where you thought the technique needed to move forward was one thing, yet the person leading (your leader) assumed something else was what was needed?  Did you feel misaligned, unheard, marginalized?  Would you believe that 54% of all leaders only use ONE style of leadership - regardless of the situation?  Does that one style of leading work well for the many levels of development we see on a team?

Perhaps your team should investigate one of the most widely used leadership models in the world ("used to train over 5 million managers in the world’s most respected organizations").  And it's not just for the leaders.  The training is most effective when everyone receives the training and uses the model.  The use of a ubiquitous language on your team is a collaboration accelerator.  When everyone is using the same mental model, speaking the same vernacular hours of frustration and discussion may be curtailed, and alignment achieved, outcomes …