I was working with a failing team some time ago. I use "failing" to describe the outcome of the team - not the people on the team. Are you OK with that description? An issue arrose in the stand up - a team member that was to verify the quality of a procedure did so and reported that there were a few records that didn't match expectation in the data set. Upon inquire the number of records not matching was over 2000. Most people acknowledged immediately the exaggeration - I could tell by the laughter. After about 10 minutes of discussing the details of the problem - it appeared the team had a handle on the specific situation. I stopped the discussion and inquired if they could name the impediment. One team member did a great job of describing the impediment as a _communication gap_ . Wonderful - I could work with that - the problem had a name and it didn't include anyones Proper Name. "If the problem has a first name; we are going to hav...