Skip to main content

Exercise:: Definition of Ready & Done

Assuming you are on a Scrum/Agile software development team, then one of the first 'working agreements' you have created with your team is a 'Definition of Done' - right?



Oh - you don't have a definition of what aspects a user story that is done will exhibit. Well then, you need to create a list of attributes of a done story. One way to do this would be to Google 'definition of done' ... here let me do that for you: http://tinyurl.com/3br9o6n. Then you could just use someone else's definition - there DONE!

But that would be cheating -- right? It is not the artifact - the list of done criteria, that is important for your team - it is the act of doing it for themselves, it is that shared understanding of having a debate over some of the gray areas that create a true working agreement. If some of the team believes that a story being done means that there can be no bugs found in the code - but some believe that there can be some minor issues - well, then you have a great point to have a team discussion. Better at the beginning of the project, rather than right before the boss says 'ship it'. If you are having this dialogue (more than a debate/discussion - everyone is explaining their assumptions and exposing their values underlying their position in dialogue) then your team has entered the 2nd stage of team formation (Forming, Storming, Norming, Preforming) - congratulations! Now there is the second reason to create a definition of done - it moves the team along the continuum of strangers to team-mates.

One team's Definition of Done. 
Note the items on the border between
Now and Next  (tacit information)
So rather than using someone else's list you want to create your own. Yes, sometimes you need a little water to prime the pump. Or you could get the energy flowing in the meeting with an exercise to get people out of their seats (you increase blood flow to the brain by 20% just by standing up) at the white board and interacting with each other. Try drawing a target (very large) - 3 concentric circles (or rectangles) on the board, label the inner most 'Now', the outer 'Later' and the middle 'Next'. That is a form of prioritization (now - > next - > later) that you want your team to become very familiar with (we use it in backlog ordering - right?). Then place stickies or index cards on the table and have someone write just one aspect of the definition of done on a card/sticky, then place it on the board in the proper location. Take turns, the next person may either - move the card to a 'better' location (now, next, later) or create a new card and post it. Play continues until we exhaust the fun in the game, or get good enough. You might want to dialogue on the aspect of growing your definition of done over time. One could easily imagine that done means something different in sprint one than it does for sprint 73 after four releases and lots of customer feedback, now that you have continuous deployment working.

If you want some cheater index cards then use mine - they are no better than anyone else's answer to a team question, but these might get a reluctant team up and interacting in the game of collaboration.

Definition of Ready Description.pdf
Definition of Ready Exercise Cards.pdf
Definition of Done Exercise Cards.pdf
-- by David Koontz

Not obvious in the example above is that the team used the items in the Next category to affinity group them by type, this was a spontaneous behavior of one of the team members.  It was a natural thing to do with visible information - it organized the display - and then we dot-voted to decide which items were the most important to work toward moving into the Now category of the Definition of Done.  Those items were then moved to the top area and circled to draw attention to them.  Then they worked on their understanding of the Definition of Ready - what do they believe the story must have to be ready for sprint planning.

Comparing these two charts - what would you say about this team's ability to plan?  What team member needs help?



In Feb of 2018 I participated in the Scrum Alliance's Webinar: 
Collaboration at Scale: Defining Done, Ready, and NO for Distributed Teams. Presentation PDF

In the process of getting ready for that presentation I created a version of this exercise on the Weave® platform.  You can play a slightly different version online with your distributed team -  in an instant with Weave - Definition of Done and Weave - Definition of Ready

Weave: Instant Play game of Defn of Done 

See Also:

Definition of Done vs. User Stories vs. Acceptance Criteria by Mark Levison of Agile Pain Relief a consultant with lot's of wise content and great practices to teach.

What is the Definition of Done in Agile? by SolutionsIQ. A great overview of the purpose and need of the DoD
An AgileGames 2013 Winner: Designing a Definition of DONE & READY

Jeff Sutherland's blog:  Ready: The Dynamic Model of Scrum

DFW-Scrum user's group Meet-Up at Sabre ( May 2012) used this exercise to hold a discussion of the 'Definition of Ready'.  Note: we used a variant of the exercise described here, designed of a general group, not a team - it worked very well.

What is the Definition of Done in Agile? - by Dhaval Panchal

George Dinwiddie's Definiton of Ready blog and InfoQ video Three Amigos (Business, Programmers, and Testers)

A checklist for Definition of Done by Luis Goncalves

Agile Definition of Done Starter Kit by Mario Moreira

What are the Principles?
What do we do to truly support those 12 Agile Principles?  We mapped our engineering practices to see if we were Agile.


5 comments

Most Popular on Agile Complexification Inverter

David's notes on "Drive"

- "The Surprising Truth about what Motivates Us" by Dan Pink.

Amazon book order
What I notice first and really like is the subtle implication in the shadow of the "i" in Drive is a person taking one step in a running motion.  This brings to mind the old saying - "there is no I in TEAM".  There is however a ME in TEAM, and there is an I in DRIVE.  And when one talks about motivating a team or an individual - it all starts with - what's in it for me.

Introduction

Pink starts with an early experiment with monkeys on problem solving.  Seems the monkeys were much better problem solver's than the scientist thought they should be.  This 1949 experiment is explained as the early understanding of motivation.  At the time there were two main drivers of motivation:  biological & external influences.  Harry F. Harlow defines the third drive in a novel theory:  "The performance of the task provided intrinsic reward" (p 3).  This is Dan Pink's M…

What is your Engagement Model?

What must an Agile Transformation initiative have to be reasonably assured of success?

We "change agents" or Agilist, or Organizational Development peeps, or Trouble Makers, or Agile Coaches have been at this for nearly two decades now... one would think we have some idea of the prerequisites for one of these Transformations to actually occur.  Wonder if eight Agile Coaches in a group could come up with ONE list of necessary and sufficient conditions - an interesting experiment.  Will that list contain an "engagement model"?  I venture to assert that it will not.  When asked very few Agile Coaches, thought leaders, and change agents mention much about employee engagement in their plans, models, and "frameworks".  Stop and ask yourselves ... why?

Now good Organizational Development peeps know this is crucial, so I purposely omitted them from that list to query.

One, central very important aspect of your Agile Transformation will be your Engagement model.  

Refactoring - examples from the book

Martin Fowler's book Refactoring:  Improving the Design of Existing Code has a simple example of a movie rental domain model, which he refactors from a less than ideal object-oriented design to a more robust OO design. Included in this Refactoring_FirstExample.zip Zip file are the Java source code files of the Movie, Rental, and Customer classes. Along with a JUnit CustomerTest class. Using these example source files you too can follow along with the refactoring that Fowler presents in the first few chapters of his book.


Metrics for a Scrum Team (examples)

What metrics do you collect to analyze your scrum team?

We live in a world of data and information.  Some people have a mindset that numbers will diagnose all problems – “just show me the data.”  Therefore many directors and senior managers wish to see some list of metrics that should indicate the productivity and efficiency of the Scrum team.  I personally believe this is something that can be felt, that human intuition is much better in this decision realm than the data that can be collected.  However, one would have to actually spend time and carefully observe the team in action to get this powerful connection to the energy in a high-performing team space.  Few leaders are willing to take this time, they delegate this information synthesis task to managers via the typical report/dashboard request.  Therefore we are asked to collect data, to condense this data into information, all while ignoring the intangible obvious signals (read Honest Signals by Sandy Pentland of MIT).
What if …