Skip to main content

Exercise:: Definition of Ready & Done

Assuming you are on a Scrum/Agile software development team, then one of the first 'working agreements' you have created with your team is a 'Definition of Done' - right?

Oh - you don't have a definition of what aspects a user story that is done will exhibit. Well then, you need to create a list of attributes of a done story. One way to do this would be to Google 'definition of done' ... here let me do that for you: Then you could just use someone else's definition - there DONE!

But that would be cheating -- right? It is not the artifact - the list of done criteria, that is important for your team - it is the act of doing it for themselves, it is that shared understanding of having a debate over some of the gray areas that create a true working agreement. If some of the team believes that a story being done means that there can be no bugs found in the code - but some believe that there can be some minor issues - well, then you have a great point to have a team discussion. Better at the beginning of the project, rather than right before the boss says 'ship it'. If you are having this dialogue (more than a debate/discussion - everyone is explaining their assumptions and exposing their values underlying their position in dialogue) then your team has entered the 2nd stage of team formation (Forming, Storming, Norming, Preforming) - congratulations! Now there is the second reason to create a definition of done - it moves the team along the continuum of strangers to team-mates.

One team's Definition of Done. 
Note the items on the border between
Now and Next  (tacit information)
So rather than using someone else's list you want to create your own. Yes, sometimes you need a little water to prime the pump. Or you could get the energy flowing in the meeting with an exercise to get people out of their seats (you increase blood flow to the brain by 20% just by standing up) at the white board and interacting with each other. Try drawing a target (very large) - 3 concentric circles (or rectangles) on the board, label the inner most 'Now', the outer 'Later' and the middle 'Next'. That is a form of prioritization (now - > next - > later) that you want your team to become very familiar with (we use it in backlog ordering - right?). Then place stickies or index cards on the table and have someone write just one aspect of the definition of done on a card/sticky, then place it on the board in the proper location. Take turns, the next person may either - move the card to a 'better' location (now, next, later) or create a new card and post it. Play continues until we exhaust the fun in the game, or get good enough. You might want to dialogue on the aspect of growing your definition of done over time. One could easily imagine that done means something different in sprint one than it does for sprint 73 after four releases and lots of customer feedback, now that you have continuous deployment working.

If you want some cheater index cards then use mine - they are no better than anyone else's answer to a team question, but these might get a reluctant team up and interacting in the game of collaboration.

Definition of Ready Description.pdf
Definition of Ready Exercise Cards.pdf
Definition of Done Exercise Cards.pdf
-- by David Koontz

Not obvious in the example above is that the team used the items in the Next category to affinity group them by type, this was a spontaneous behavior of one of the team members.  It was a natural thing to do with visible information - it organized the display - and then we dot-voted to decide which items were the most important to work toward moving into the Now category of the Definition of Done.  Those items were then moved to the top area and circled to draw attention to them.  Then they worked on their understanding of the Definition of Ready - what do they believe the story must have to be ready for sprint planning.

Comparing these two charts - what would you say about this team's ability to plan?  What team member needs help?

In Feb of 2018 I participated in the Scrum Alliance's Webinar: 
Collaboration at Scale: Defining Done, Ready, and NO for Distributed Teams. Presentation PDF

In the process of getting ready for that presentation I created a version of this exercise on the Weave® platform.  You can play a slightly different version online with your distributed team -  in an instant with Weave - Definition of Done and Weave - Definition of Ready

Weave: Instant Play game of Defn of Done 

See Also:

Definition of Done vs. User Stories vs. Acceptance Criteria by Mark Levison of Agile Pain Relief a consultant with lot's of wise content and great practices to teach.

What is the Definition of Done in Agile? by SolutionsIQ. A great overview of the purpose and need of the DoD
An AgileGames 2013 Winner: Designing a Definition of DONE & READY

Jeff Sutherland's blog:  Ready: The Dynamic Model of Scrum

DFW-Scrum user's group Meet-Up at Sabre ( May 2012) used this exercise to hold a discussion of the 'Definition of Ready'.  Note: we used a variant of the exercise described here, designed of a general group, not a team - it worked very well.

What is the Definition of Done in Agile? - by Dhaval Panchal

George Dinwiddie's Definiton of Ready blog and InfoQ video Three Amigos (Business, Programmers, and Testers)

A checklist for Definition of Done by Luis Goncalves

What are the Principles?
What do we do to truly support those 12 Agile Principles?  We mapped our engineering practices to see if we were Agile.


Most Popular on Agile Complexification Inverter

Elements of an Effective Scrum Task Board

What are the individual elements that make a Scrum task board effective for the team and the leadership of the team?  There are a few basic elements that are quite obvious when you have seen a few good Scrum boards... but there are some other elements that appear to elude even the most servant of leaders of Scrum teams.

In general I'm referring to a physical Scrum board.  Although software applications will replicated may of the elements of a good Scrum board there will be affordances that are not easily replicated.  And software applications offer features not easily implemented in the physical domain also.

Scrum Info Radiator Checklist (PDF) Basic Elements
Board Framework - columns and rows laid out in bold colors (blue tape works well)
Attributes:  space for the total number of stickies that will need to belong in each cell of the matrix;  lines that are not easy eroded, but are also easy to replace;  see Orientation.

Columns (or Rows) - labeled
    To Do
    Work In P…

Webinar: Collaboration at Scale: Defining Done, Ready, and NO.

I was invited to participate in a Scrum Alliance Webinar.  Maybe you would like to listen to us in a discussion of techniques to collaborate at scale (remotely and with many people).  The topic is one that I've got some experience in discussions - yet I never seem to get to done...
Collaboration at Scale: Defining Done and Ready and NO for Distributed Teams
With Joel Bancroft-Connors, Agile Organizational Coach; David A. Koontz, Agile Transition Guide; and Luke Hohmann, CEO and Founder of Conteneo, Inc.

14 February 2018 11 a.m. ET (USA).

The Scrum Guide is pretty clear on the criticality of the definition of Done: "When a Product Backlog item or an Increment is described as "Done," everyone must understand what "Done" means. However, the Scrum Guide ALSO says that the definition of Done can "vary significantly per Scrum Team." This leads us to examine when and how the definition of Done should vary, how distributed teams should cr…

A T-Shaped 21st Century Knowledge Worker

Knowledge workers in the 21st Century must have many areas of deep knowledge, while also be capable of collaboration across multiple other domains with dissimilar T-shaped individuals.  This description of a person is a metaphor.  Compare it to the shape of the "I" in the classic saying there is no "I" in Team.

I first read about Scott Ambler's term "Generalizing Specialist" - but it's so hard to remember the proper order of the words... get it backwards and it has an inverted meaning... T-Shaped is easier to remember. 
A generalizing specialist is someone who:
Has one or more technical specialties (e.g. Java programming, Project Management, Database Administration, ...). Has at least a general knowledge of software development. Has at least a general knowledge of the business domain in which they work. Actively seeks to gain new skills in both their existing specialties as well as in other areas, including both technical and domain areas.  General…

A FAILURE to Communicate

I was working with a failing team some time ago.  I use "failing" to describe the outcome of the team - not the people on the team.  Are you OK with that description?

An issue arrose in the stand up - a team member that was to verify the quality of a procedure did so and reported that there were a few records that didn't match expectation in the data set.  Upon inquire the number of records not matching was over 2000.  Most people acknowledged immediately the exaggeration - I could tell by the laughter.  After about 10 minutes of discussing the details of the problem - it appeared the team had a handle on the specific situation.

I stopped the discussion and inquired if they could name the impediment.  One team member did a great job of describing the impediment as a _communication gap_.  Wonderful - I could work with that - the problem had a name and it didn't include anyones Proper Name.

"If the problem has a first name; we are going to have a problem."