|Leadership desires - Info Radiators|
|Team desires - Info Radiators|
In general I'm referring to a physical Scrum board. Although software applications will replicated may of the elements of a good Scrum board there will be affordances that are not easily replicated. And software applications offer features not easily implemented in the physical domain also.
Board Framework - columns and rows laid out in bold colors (blue tape works well)
Attributes: space for the total number of stickies that will need to belong in each cell of the matrix; lines that are not easy eroded, but are also easy to replace; see Orientation.
Columns (or Rows) - labeled
Work In Process - (many teams limit WIP - label this or make the column very small)
Rows (or Columns)
a column title label row (at the top)
one row for each story in the sprint backlog
one row for each unique action item from the retrospective
(optional) rows for company initiatives that team members will be working upon
Attributes: title, description, acceptance criteria, effort size, delivery order (backlog priority), business value, dependencies, negotiated in/out of scope agreements, etc. See Also: One sentence does not make a User Story.
Tasks - a sticky note or index card for each task the team identifies or discovers in the sprint.
Attributes: each task should be specific (not something like "test it"), each task should be less that a day's worth of effort (when this is not true - the first action of the task should be to break the task up into a plan of action); each task should be estimated in relative units (different & more fine grained than story points) - for example "aspirin"- this is proportional to the amount of wall clock time between it's current state and done (not equal, but proportional to real time). See Also: What belongs on the TASK board?
Sprint Burndown Chart - task units remaining plotted per day; with sketches of the trend lines; annotated with events that impacted the sprint (ex: reduced scope on day 4; pulled in small story on day 8; holiday on Monday, flu hit the team, etc.). See Also: A burndown chart that radiates information.
Impediments List - the one guarantee that Scrum will deliver - and if you are not capturing these on a daily biases and the triaging these, recording the resolutions, reflecting periodically on the classification of root causes -- well then you are not doing Scrum. See Also: 7 aspects of a great Impediment Sticky.
Trend of Sprint success - Predictability graph - graph each sprints planned story points and the accepted (by PO) story points; the simplest form of this is a binary trend of success (sprint delivered on time, in budget, with planned scope) or not. See Also: Metrics for a Scrum Team.
Working Agreements - team working agreements are always a great way to quickly negotiate the forming, storming, norming phases of team development; these are living documents and should be posted in the team room, so that they can be mutated as understanding grows.
Definition of Ready & Done - a team with a shared understanding of their meaning of done will be much more likely to deliver potentially shippable working and tested software each sprint; a understanding of stories ready for sprint planning will lead to a robust definition of done; one is a precursor catalyst agent for the other. See Also: Exercise: Definition of Done.
Calendar - a very old planning tool; heck even the Maya used one. A great place to note holidays, and events that will impact the team (like the beginning of the next sprint, the time of the next demo, the projected release ship date, etc.)
Backlog - a wish list becomes a Scrum backlog when it attains three things: effort size estimates by the team that will do the work, a stack ranked deliver order made by the PO, visibility to the whole team (and by visibility I mean via an information radiator - not a spreadsheet on someones hard drive information cooler).
Navteq data processing visualized
components added to the model each sprint.
Day of Sprint - count down clock, I prefer to focus on the done so I like the days to count down to D-day (Demo).
Project Goals / Objectives / Elevator pitch - this is typically the release level objectives or release acceptance criteria - how will we judge each story as moving us closer or further from these objectives for this release - how do we know when the release has accumulated enough value to ship it? See Product Positioning Statement in Beyond Software Architecture by L Hohmann.
Trophy Wall - big game hunters like trophies. They can take many forms, like the data flow model done at Navteq. It does wonders for the team moral.
Avatars - photos of each team member (including the PO & SM); these should be small but instantly recognized as that person - even by an outsider or stakeholder (don't use Bill-the-Cat)
Impeded - bright colorful attention getting contrasting sticky - noting the reason the story/task is impeded. See '7 Aspects of a GREAT Impediment Sticky'.
Theme Dots - colored sticky dots to indicate themes (well know to the team - with a reference key and labels)
Dependency - sticky annotation to label the item as dependent upon another task/story.
Orientation - Horizontal or Vertical
I find that everyone starts a task board with a horizontal flow, task moving from left to right. This is easiest to conceptualize when beginning to adopt the practice. However it will soon create an impediment. I've found it amazing that few teams are capable of realizing this impediment and solving it. The problem with the horizontal board flow is that the available space for stories is then limited by the human hight ergonomics. We don't like to stand on step stools or bend over - therefore we have about 50 inches of useful space located about 2 feet above the floor. This impediment will lead many teams to start creating smaller row heights for each story.
|A Scrum task board in need of 90 deg. rotation.|
Physical vs Software Application
Let's discuss the pros & cons of this aspect of the tools. Ah... don't get me started. There is no comparison, physical, tactical, haptic boards have far superior affordances than the expensive software doppelgänger. When I'm teaching a team new to Scrum there is no replacement for a physical board. The information that flows when one knows how to watch and read the negative space of interaction during the stand-up meeting is phenomenal compared to the stand-up using a projector and application. And this level of observation is what the beginning scrum master needs to learn to pick up upon, it is orders of magnitude harder for me to teach using a virtual Scrum board.
However for a team that has mastered the basics of the process, and understands the reasons for most all of the behaviors they are practicing, moving to a virtual Scrum board will add a few affordances that are not available in the physical realm. These affordances are portability, time dislocation, multi-site collaboration, etc. All very advanced stages of team dynamics - WARNING - do not start with these attributes at the top of your team dynamics desires.
Google Ventures' Jake Knapp wrote about their war room - here are just a few of his reasons that resonate with this post:
Spatial Memory > Short-term Memory
To solve a complex design problem, you need to track lots of moving parts. As humans, our short-term memory is not all that good--but our spatial memory is awesome. Plaster a room with notes and you take advantage of that spatial memory. You begin to know where information is, which extends your ability to remember things.
Physical Ideas are Easier to Manipulate
We all know it’s better to re-order a prioritized list of sticky notes or re-draw a diagram than to make the same decisions verbally. That’s why there are whiteboards in meeting rooms and why people love agile trackers with sticky notes. War rooms take those tools to the next level.See a video tour of Google Ventures' War Room: Your Design Team Needs A War Room. Here's How To Set One UP Want to foster creativity? Skip the foosball table and opt for a war room instead.
Want an example of affordances on a dashboard or infographic?
Affordances and Signifiers: applying design theory to your dashboards
Missing Affordances by David Koontz
Master's thesis paper: "Analysis of a paper- and software-based Scrum task board" by Jan Segers
Agile For All blog - Building a Useful Task Board by Richard Lawerence
Visual Management Blog by Xavier Quesada Allue Elements of Taskboard Design
Task Boards: Telling a Compelling Agile Story by Tom Perry