Skip to main content

Transparency of Price in Health Care

Does it exist?

Health care in the USA is under great pressure to change these days.  So regardless of which pole of the political sphere you personally are drawn toward, the landscape underneath your view point will be changing.  One could ask why.  It is an interesting line of inquiry.  Will the fact that health care is just too costly, increasing at exponential rates, and leaving an ever enlarging number of americans out of the "care" system suffice for the moment?

So this domain of the american system is being pushed off a proverbial cliff into a turbulent troubled sea of change.  I wonder - do we have any system models that would describe what might help in these situations?

Here's a case in point, a CEO announce a spur of the moment policy change, a move toward transparency.  Why?  Perhaps he was frustrated with the ill-rational behavior of "the system".  And decide that a move toward transparency was a rational behavior.

Florida Hospital Takes a Step Toward Price Transparency
Miami's Mount Sinai Medical Center has pledged to publicly disclose its price contracts with insurers
By Kate Pickert June 03, 2013 TIME.com

Speaking in May on a local public radio affiliate, WLRN, Steve Sonenreich, CEO of the Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, FLA, said, “We’d be willing to put our prices to all the insurance companies out in public and we would welcome that kind of transparency of everyone in the marketplace.”

More articles on the money issue:  Follow the money with Time's Steven Brill.
Steven Brill - The Daily Show
Watching Jon Stewart's interview you may realize that the health care industry is not like any industry you are familiar with -- let's say one that you work in, where reasonable people do things with reasonable cause and effect correlation.  So how do we model this rather chaotic (Alice in Wonderland) world such that we can make reasonable decision about how to tame the beast?  If you are from another domain (say regular world) you may be tempted to apply regular world logic to a small subset of the problems and be surprised by the systems behavior.  A case in point, almost every other industry has some level of price transparency.  Customers have choices before they purchase a good or service and may choose to shop around based upon price.  So what happens when some nut job suggest that health care do the same?  Well you can bet the chaotic system does not react like your normal world system.

If only there was a general model of this meta system of systems - some which behave sanely, and some which are just too difficult to understand.  A model that could give us some guidance as to how to behave when we knew which land we happen to be in at any one moment.

Do you know of such a model?  Let me see, here's a few:

Reagan's Trickel-down economics (Supply-side)
Keynesian economics
Various economic models compared to scientific models
Wonderland model

I don't think these models will work for our problem.  Why?  Because they do not model insane systems very well.  They all seem to assume the rational mind exist within the system.  And I think we can agree -- there is no rational control within the health care system.

Perhaps if we go a bit more abstract... maybe a weather system model will work.  Those model really weird system that produce erratic behaviors like hurricanes and tornados and even sharknados.

Or maybe we are barking up the wrong tree... perhaps we should simplify our models...  try to make sense of the meta information, apply some common sense to the problems instead of getting inside the tornados of data and assuming that every thing moves in a counter-clockwise direction (talk about getting wrapped around the axel).

Try this simple model... based on the classic two dimensional four quadrant model... but with a dimensional twist out of the page... kinda like MC Escher would do...  So it is a bit like a model that fits wonderland.  Cynefin framework by David Snowden.




Back to the health care price transparency issue now.  Which Cynefin domain is health care pricing?  Hum... oh I fear answering because I could get it wrong...  well there's only 4 domain, I've got a 25% chance just by guessing.  WRONG!  There are 5 domains and the fact that I don't know which domain I'm in tells us the answer, we are in the disordered domain (the 5th one - the one we are most likely to be in most of the time).  Damn, I think Mr. Snowden may be on to something here.

So if health care pricing is in a discorded domain, what's the model tell us we should do?  I think (and I may be wrong - and wouldn't that be FUN) it doesn't matter - we act, then sense.  So was Steve Sonenreich, CEO of the Mount Sinai wrong to just act?  To suggest that price transparency may be a good thing for the system.  Then to sense what the system does with this new input.  Certainly the people in his organization had a bit of panic in their throats and had to change lots of things to make his decision a reality.  We might not see the cause and effect for some years to come.  So be very careful when we sense.  We might not sense the ripple effect.

How does Snowden suggest we sense?

I'll leave that you to you to answer.
Post a Comment

Most Popular on Agile Complexification Inverter

Exercise:: Definition of Ready & Done

Assuming you are on a Scrum/Agile software development team, then one of the first 'working agreements' you have created with your team is a 'Definition of Done' - right?



Oh - you don't have a definition of what aspects a user story that is done will exhibit. Well then, you need to create a list of attributes of a done story. One way to do this would be to Google 'definition of done' ... here let me do that for you: http://tinyurl.com/3br9o6n. Then you could just use someone else's definition - there DONE!

But that would be cheating -- right? It is not the artifact - the list of done criteria, that is important for your team - it is the act of doing it for themselves, it is that shared understanding of having a debate over some of the gray areas that create a true working agreement. If some of the team believes that a story being done means that there can be no bugs found in the code - but some believe that there can be some minor issues - well, …

Elements of an Effective Scrum Task Board

What are the individual elements that make a Scrum task board effective for the team and the leadership of the team?  There are a few basic elements that are quite obvious when you have seen a few good Scrum boards... but there are some other elements that appear to elude even the most servant of leaders of Scrum teams.









In general I'm referring to a physical Scrum board.  Although software applications will replicated may of the elements of a good Scrum board there will be affordances that are not easily replicated.  And software applications offer features not easily implemented in the physical domain also.





Scrum Info Radiator Checklist (PDF) Basic Elements
Board Framework - columns and rows laid out in bold colors (blue tape works well)
Attributes:  space for the total number of stickies that will need to belong in each cell of the matrix;  lines that are not easy eroded, but are also easy to replace;  see Orientation.

Columns (or Rows) - labeled
    Stories
    To Do
    Work In P…

Webinar: Collaboration at Scale: Defining Done, Ready, and NO.

I was invited to participate in a Scrum Alliance Webinar.  Maybe you would like to listen to us in a discussion of techniques to collaborate at scale (remotely and with many people).  The topic is one that I've got some experience in discussions - yet I never seem to get to done...
Collaboration at Scale: Defining Done and Ready and NO for Distributed Teams
With Joel Bancroft-Connors, Agile Organizational Coach; David A. Koontz, Agile Transition Guide; and Luke Hohmann, CEO and Founder of Conteneo, Inc.


14 February 2018 11 a.m. ET (USA).




The Scrum Guide is pretty clear on the criticality of the definition of Done: "When a Product Backlog item or an Increment is described as "Done," everyone must understand what "Done" means. However, the Scrum Guide ALSO says that the definition of Done can "vary significantly per Scrum Team." This leads us to examine when and how the definition of Done should vary, how distributed teams should cr…

A T-Shaped 21st Century Knowledge Worker

Knowledge workers in the 21st Century must have many areas of deep knowledge, while also be capable of collaboration across multiple other domains with dissimilar T-shaped individuals.  This description of a person is a metaphor.  Compare it to the shape of the "I" in the classic saying there is no "I" in Team.


I first read about Scott Ambler's term "Generalizing Specialist" - but it's so hard to remember the proper order of the words... get it backwards and it has an inverted meaning... T-Shaped is easier to remember. 
A generalizing specialist is someone who:
Has one or more technical specialties (e.g. Java programming, Project Management, Database Administration, ...). Has at least a general knowledge of software development. Has at least a general knowledge of the business domain in which they work. Actively seeks to gain new skills in both their existing specialties as well as in other areas, including both technical and domain areas.  General…

A FAILURE to Communicate

I was working with a failing team some time ago.  I use "failing" to describe the outcome of the team - not the people on the team.  Are you OK with that description?



An issue arrose in the stand up - a team member that was to verify the quality of a procedure did so and reported that there were a few records that didn't match expectation in the data set.  Upon inquire the number of records not matching was over 2000.  Most people acknowledged immediately the exaggeration - I could tell by the laughter.  After about 10 minutes of discussing the details of the problem - it appeared the team had a handle on the specific situation.

I stopped the discussion and inquired if they could name the impediment.  One team member did a great job of describing the impediment as a _communication gap_.  Wonderful - I could work with that - the problem had a name and it didn't include anyones Proper Name.

"If the problem has a first name; we are going to have a problem."

I&#…