Skip to main content

No Fine for Coming Late to the Standup

I was asked the other day how to change a culture of showing up late for meetings.  It is very difficult to change that cultural norm.  I'm not sure how to change it but I know one standard technique that will not help.  Do not set up a system of fines for people that come late to your meetings.  It will not work.

A common "solution" is to fine people a dollar if they are late to a standard set meeting (like a Scrum Standup meeting).  The dollar amount will vary - but this is just negotiating on price, it doesn't have any bearing on the problem.

Reminds me of the old joke.

Man at bar:  "Will you sleep with me for a million dollars?"
Woman:  "Well, yes, for a million dollars."
Man:  "OK, how about for $50?"
Woman:  "No!  What do you think I am?"
Man:  "We've established that - now we're negotiating price."

The problem is the group norm of coming late to meetings is an accepted practice.  The solution to correct the practice is to stop accepting the behavior.  To point out that the group has decided to change it's norms and that the behavior is no longer acceptable.

I've had no problem starting meetings on time in companies with this typical group norm.  The secret is to not give in the first time, or the second time.  Start the meeting and let the late comers know they are late by not stopping to allow them to interrupt the meeting on their schedule.  Take control, keep control, keep the meeting on topic and on the agenda.  Then perhaps, politely tell the person how they can catch themselves up to the group.

Dan Pink gives the experimental evidence of why punishment will not work in these situations in his book Drive on page 52.  In brief the story is of a child care facility that was a study case in 2000 for two economists in Israel.   Studying the before and after behavior for 20 weeks of parents picking up children late after the center closed.  The event being studied was the posting of a sign announcing a fine for coming late.  The results of applying a fine to the parents for picking up children late:  more tardiness!  "The rate finally settled, at a level that was higher, and almost twice as large as the initial one."

Do not trade the moral obligation to be prompt for a meeting, for a transactional (I can buy my tardiness) no obligation except to pay a small fee.

Now perhaps if the fee were very high and enforcible by law....  No probably not - we all speed in our cars - don't we.

Most Popular on Agile Complexification Inverter

Elements of an Effective Scrum Task Board

What are the individual elements that make a Scrum task board effective for the team and the leadership of the team?  There are a few basic elements that are quite obvious when you have seen a few good Scrum boards... but there are some other elements that appear to elude even the most servant of leaders of Scrum teams.

In general I'm referring to a physical Scrum board.  Although software applications will replicated may of the elements of a good Scrum board there will be affordances that are not easily replicated.  And software applications offer features not easily implemented in the physical domain also.

Scrum Info Radiator Checklist (PDF) Basic Elements
Board Framework - columns and rows laid out in bold colors (blue tape works well)
Attributes:  space for the total number of stickies that will need to belong in each cell of the matrix;  lines that are not easy eroded, but are also easy to replace;  see Orientation.

Columns (or Rows) - labeled
    To Do
    Work In P…

Exercise:: Definition of Ready & Done

Assuming you are on a Scrum/Agile software development team, then one of the first 'working agreements' you have created with your team is a 'Definition of Done' - right?

Oh - you don't have a definition of what aspects a user story that is done will exhibit. Well then, you need to create a list of attributes of a done story. One way to do this would be to Google 'definition of done' ... here let me do that for you: Then you could just use someone else's definition - there DONE!

But that would be cheating -- right? It is not the artifact - the list of done criteria, that is important for your team - it is the act of doing it for themselves, it is that shared understanding of having a debate over some of the gray areas that create a true working agreement. If some of the team believes that a story being done means that there can be no bugs found in the code - but some believe that there can be some minor issues - well, …

What belongs on the Task Board?

I wonder about these questions a lot - what types of task belong on the task board?  Does every task have to belong to a Story?  Are some tasks just too small?  Are some tasks too obvious?  Obviously some task are too larger, but when should it be decomposed?  How will we know a task is too large?

I answer these questions with a question.  What about a task board motivates us to get work done?  The answer is: T.A.S.K.S. to DONE!

Inherent in the acronym TASKS is the point of all tasks, to get to done.  That is the measure of if the task is the right size.  Does it motivate us to get the work done?  (see notes on Dan Pink's book: Drive - The surprising Truth about what motivates us) If we are forgetting to do some class of task then putting it on the board will help us remember.  If we think some small task is being done by someone else, then putting it on the board will validate that someone else is actually doing it.  If a task is obvious, then putting it on the board will take vi…

A T-Shaped 21st Century Knowledge Worker

Knowledge workers in the 21st Century must have many areas of deep knowledge, while also be capable of collaboration across multiple other domains with dissimilar T-shaped individuals.  This description of a person is a metaphor.  Compare it to the shape of the "I" in the classic saying there is no "I" in Team.

I first read about Scott Ambler's term "Generalizing Specialist" - but it's so hard to remember the proper order of the words... get it backwards and it has an inverted meaning... T-Shaped is easier to remember. 
A generalizing specialist is someone who:
Has one or more technical specialties (e.g. Java programming, Project Management, Database Administration, ...). Has at least a general knowledge of software development. Has at least a general knowledge of the business domain in which they work. Actively seeks to gain new skills in both their existing specialties as well as in other areas, including both technical and domain areas.  General…

David's notes on "Drive"

- "The Surprising Truth about what Motivates Us" by Dan Pink.

Amazon book order
What I notice first and really like is the subtle implication in the shadow of the "i" in Drive is a person taking one step in a running motion.  This brings to mind the old saying - "there is no I in TEAM".  There is however a ME in TEAM, and there is an I in DRIVE.  And when one talks about motivating a team or an individual - it all starts with - what's in it for me.


Pink starts with an early experiment with monkeys on problem solving.  Seems the monkeys were much better problem solver's than the scientist thought they should be.  This 1949 experiment is explained as the early understanding of motivation.  At the time there were two main drivers of motivation:  biological & external influences.  Harry F. Harlow defines the third drive in a novel theory:  "The performance of the task provided intrinsic reward" (p 3).  This is Dan Pink's M…